Social Capital: Dealing with Community Emergencies

Social Capital: Dealing with Community Emergencies

Russell R. Dynes

Russell_Dynes

ABSTRACT:
Terrorism produces what is conventionally called disaster. The locus of the response to disaster is the community, which as a unit has the social capital necessary to respond to disasters. The six forms of social capital referenced in this article are obligations and expectations, informational potential, norms and effective sanctions, authority relations, appropriable social organizations, and intentional organizations. Most disaster research has fixated primarily on the destruction of physical capital (structures) and secondarily on the destruction of human capital (lives); social capital is less tangible but, of all forms of capital, is less damaged and less affected by disaster. Consequently, during the emergency period of disaster response, it is social capital that serves as the primary basis for a community response. In addition, social capital is the only form of capital which is renewed and enhanced during the emergency period. This article looks at the ways in which the theory of social capital might be helpful in understanding our response to threat and disaster.

Read full article.

SUGGESTED CITATION:

Dynes, Russell R. “Social Capital: Dealing with Community Emergencies.” Homeland Security Affairs II, no. 2 (July 2006)
http://www.hsaj.org/?article=2.2.5

http://www.hsaj.org/